always wary of those who in the name of an alleged or science fiction, religion or spiritual rumination on the other gender, they start ravanare in my brain, trying causes, effects, links, associations, dissociations: developing magnificent paintings or distressing. Grinding my actions, my thoughts, to make a puzzle where the pieces are missing, as it happens, can you provide them and at modest prices (but with the bill .. only if requested)
All sciences that relate to the explanation, regulatory or coding of human behavior are very approximate, but an approximation that tends to build an indisputable fact, scientific fact, but rather the creation of free space, which engage in raids dreamy, literary, and critical operations weird ... .. or worse!
In the years that I had read and even with passion, to a lesser extent Freud and Jung. Beautiful humanists, literary luminaries, analysts refined the crisis of a particular man of the Mittlere Europe, the collapse disturbing archetype of an era, a system of values. Nobody has been able to explain how their the cultural and emotional background of the monster that was there to come: Nazism
huge and generous men, small and narrow-minded science that runs' on them! The
more than any other movement that characterizes the psychology of today is the result. The science that would sink into the shadows and dark spots, to emerge as a beam of light that explains that enlightens, but now is a stone plate, which gives form and color (gray) and imposes the horizon (for convenience) .
It 's a very conformist and aligned pseudo science, instrumental and superficial.
His favorite place of action is not the human being and his peculiar and irreducible humanity, but the company: the place that produces and reproduces objects and relationships, leveraging, once, on the physical and mental strength of workers, now, instead, drawing on the spirit and predatory "policy science" resources emotional, psychological, relational capabilities.
E 'hiring practices that exceed the screening of a "conversation" with the psychologist and it is very normal that the big companies do a continuous monitoring of "relationality''" within the company. It 'obvious that any internal restructuring, because it is often simplistic or destructive of rights presuppose the subtle persuasion, penetrating, invasive. Coercion can be subtle: History has shown that almost always, when and 'clear and explicit, generates opposition and conflict, at least, simple rebellion but if it retains the last act, that of the submission, subject to the same, it loses its violent and oppressive nature and acquires the character of persuasion. The care of the 'last act "is a matter of psychology, and the instruments available to it.
from end to middle. Each
restructuring, large or small, need for turning points, with joints: also generates, inevitably, criticism. However, the bearings, are times of spiritual growth, relational and emotional, the individual can not reject, otherwise it is inadequate to the universe: the critical weaknesses of the system are nothing more than character, serious incompatibility ', flaws that undermine the foundations of our balance.
I put in place the company and, while we are, you improve or even you I care.
income that you do is your health and your balance with the world.
Anyone who is found in these contexts, will have surely noticed that the first thing that immediately stands out and says it is the repudiation of the conflict, reducing it to pathology. There 'instead (special) a grid of possible problems with short and clear paths to reach the solution of the same. Are Only aftershocks best to shore up the building.
E 'fraudulent use of a science, the cap is put to its growth and evolution.
Why is granted to them that will please the appellation of psychologists, continue to perpetuate this colossal hoax? Because there is' no trace of distancing and disavowal of this kind of operation to be part of other psychologists? Because academic institutions have not decided to declare the total unfounded scientific and ethical betrayal of such a use of psychology? Yeah ... .. ', why?
Fino Luigi
